{"created":"2023-06-23T12:12:36.492133+00:00","id":630,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"ccd63275-e4c5-408b-84d2-703ddcb2c4a2"},"_deposit":{"created_by":14,"id":"630","owners":[14],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"630"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:iuj.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000630","sets":["287"]},"author_link":["773","272"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2004-08-01","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"語学プログラム  ワーキングペーパー"},{"bibliographic_title":"Working papers, the language programs","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Commenting on student writing is generally considered to hold a central place in both first (L1) and second language (L2) writing pedagogy. However, despite several decades of research on feedback and response, our understanding of its complex nature is still far from complete, which is due in part to methodological flaws that have made it difficult to compare results across studies. The present study aims to address this by applying a well-developed analytical framework to teacher comments and student revisions collected from a university L1 composition course in the United States. Comments were analyzed according to a framework that included length, textual referent, focus, mode, and salience; revisions were analyzed according to uptake and success. This analysis revealed both general patterns and a substantial amount of variation in the types of comments that the teacher provided as well as the revisions that followed those comments. Some of this variation was clearly associated with contextual factors such as mode of delivery (handwritten versus online commentary), sequencing of assignments and drafts, and individual student factors. It is concluded that teachers may comment more effectively by addressing a limited number of issues on any given draft in greater depth. Moreover, future research on commentary may benefit from both quantitative and qualitative analyses.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Clements, Peter"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"773","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Clements, Peter","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"272","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2017-07-28"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"01_15_0001.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"2.2 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"01_15_0001","url":"https://iuj.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/630/files/01_15_0001.pdf"},"version_id":"fff336c4-ac93-4676-8748-022cc92de2ba"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"eng"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"作文のフィードバックと書き直し作業について : L1の授業から","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"作文のフィードバックと書き直し作業について : L1の授業から"},{"subitem_title":"Written feedback and revision : Some data from a L1 writing class","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"14","path":["287"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2004-08-01"},"publish_date":"2004-08-01","publish_status":"0","recid":"630","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["作文のフィードバックと書き直し作業について : L1の授業から"],"weko_creator_id":"14","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-06-23T12:24:44.689250+00:00"}