WEKO3
アイテム
Learning style differences between Japan and Thailand: A case of Japanese multinationals
https://iuj.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/457
https://iuj.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/45720fd86b2-ad67-49ea-acdf-ae3847ec4fbf
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2011-09-01 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Learning style differences between Japan and Thailand: A case of Japanese multinationals | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Learning style differences between Japan and Thailand: A case of Japanese multinationals | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Learning styles | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | specialized vs. balanced orientation | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Thailand | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Japan | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Japanese multinationals | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Learning styles | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | specialized vs. balanced orientation | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Thailand | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Japan | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Japanese multinationals | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
著者 |
山崎, 佳孝
× 山崎, 佳孝× Attrapreyangkul, Thitiwat× Yamazaki, Yoshitaka× Attrapreyangkul, Thitiwat |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | We compared various aspects of learning styles between Japan and Thailand through the lens of experiential learning theory. A total of 398 participants who work for Japanese multinational corporations were surveyed and examined with controlling age, gender, work experience periods, and hierarchical management positions. Results showed that the two country differencesignificantly impacted all learning style variables concerning a dialectical learning dimension of feeling and thinking, In the process of learning, for example, Japanese employees learned through more feeling and less thinking, whereas Thai employees learned equally applying the four learning modes of feeling, thinking, reflecting, and action. Although the learning style ofJapanese employees indicated diverging on average, the analysis of their learning style distribution revealed that accommodating was most dominated. Thai employees were categorized in accommodating learning style that was not so specialized at feeling and acting modes. Instead,they possessed balanced learning style as their distinctive characteristic. Based on those findings, we discussed theoretical and practical implications. | |||||
書誌情報 |
en : Economics & Management Series 発行日 2011-09-01 |