ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 語学プログラム ワーキングペーパー

Learning syntax through semantics: An instructional experiment

https://iuj.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/597
https://iuj.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/597
affd051a-4126-4da5-9ad0-c61dac95b5a6
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
01_07_0004.pdf 01_07_0004 (2.1 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 1995-03-01
タイトル
タイトル Learning syntax through semantics: An instructional experiment
タイトル
タイトル Learning syntax through semantics: An instructional experiment
言語 en
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
著者 Sawyer, Mark

× Sawyer, Mark

WEKO 760

Sawyer, Mark

Search repository
Sawyer, Mark

× Sawyer, Mark

WEKO 208

en Sawyer, Mark

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 This experiment is part of a doctoral dissertation (Sawyer, 1995) that presents data from three tasks-novel verb elicited production, picture description, and acceptability judgments-to shed light on how adult Japanese learners of English represent the dative alternation, and how those representations can change as a result of instruction. The dissertation adopts the framework of Pinker's (1989) semantic structure theory, according to which the complex constraints on argument structure alternations are fundamentally semantic, and are learnable largely due Universal Grammar-based sensitivity to two levels of semantic criteria. These criteria are assumed to have their effect by means of two layers of lexical rules that operate on the semantic structures of verbs. The particular experiment reported here is an instructional experiment exploring the teachability of semantics-syntax correspondences. One group of learners was given instruction on the semantic criteria underlying the dative alternation, while a second group was given comparable instruction on the locative alternation. A control group was given no relevant instruction. Although no statistically reliable differences were found among the groups, the results were in the expected direction. The group with instruction on the dative alternation became gradually more accurate, followed by the group with information on a related alternation, followed by the control group, whose judgments remained stable.
書誌情報 語学プログラム ワーキングペーパー
en : Working papers, the language programs

発行日 1995-03-01
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-06-23 12:25:40.897710
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3