WEKO3
アイテム
The State Policy Processes of Tax and Expenditure Limitations in the U.S.
https://iuj.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/914
https://iuj.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/914ba5c0354-8fa6-41de-9923-4e70caee1f3d
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2017-06-01 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | The State Policy Processes of Tax and Expenditure Limitations in the U.S. | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | The State Policy Processes of Tax and Expenditure Limitations in the U.S. | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Tax and Expenditure Limitations | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Competition | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Imitation | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Direct democracy | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Tax and Expenditure Limitations | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Competition | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Imitation | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Direct democracy | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
著者 |
Kim, Koomin
× Kim, Koomin× Lim, Seunghoo× Kim, Koomin× Lim, Seunghoo |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | Previous research and theory on policy innovation and diffusion have developed explanatory factors for the adoption of TELs. However, past research on which states adopt TELs have only examined the first adoption dates. However, since the state policy making regarding TELs is more complicated—TELs have been proposed and failed, and multiple TELs have been passed since 1970. These previous studies have limitations and have not considered the comprehensive policy making process of TELs adoption and revision. In this respect, this research empirically examines the differentiated process of adoptions through event history analysis (EHA) using state data from 1970 to 2006. This study reveals the comprehensive policy making process of TEL adoption that can be summarized as follows: (1) having a direct democracy initiative continuously affects the adoption process of TELs; (2) states will imitate other similar states' TELs based on size (expenditure) during the agenda setting process; and (3) Enactment failure of TELs is induced by anticipatory competition that states behave strategically, and successful passage of TELs are driven by direct democracy, and professionalized legislature rather than regional diffusion factors. | |||||
書誌情報 |
en : Economics & Management Series 発行日 2017-06-01 |