WEKO3
アイテム
Economic Tertiarization and Regional Income Inequality in a Decentralized Indonesia: A Bi-dimensional Inequality Decomposition Analysis
https://iuj.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/940
https://iuj.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/940d3c1bf7f-52b9-4583-910b-5d6f985fa52a
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2020-02-12 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Economic Tertiarization and Regional Income Inequality in a Decentralized Indonesia: A Bi-dimensional Inequality Decomposition Analysis | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Economic Tertiarization and Regional Income Inequality in a Decentralized Indonesia: A Bi-dimensional Inequality Decomposition Analysis | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | regional income inequality | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Indonesia | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | economic tertiarization | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | deindustrialization | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | bi-dimensional inequality decomposition | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | regional income inequality | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Indonesia | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | economic tertiarization | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | deindustrialization | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | bi-dimensional inequality decomposition | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
著者 |
Alisjahbana, Armida S.
× Alisjahbana, Armida S.× 秋田, 隆裕× Alisjahbana, Armida S.× Akita, Takahiro |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | This study attempts to explore the determinants of interprovincial income inequality in Indonesia from 2005 to 2013 by using a bi-dimensional inequality decomposition method. It tries, particularly, to analyze how economic tertiarization and concurrent output deindustrialization have affected interprovincial inequality. The bi-dimensional inequality decomposition method decomposes interprovincial inequality as measured by the squared population-weighted coefficient of variation in two dimensions, namely, by regional groups and industrial sectors. While deindustrialization has lowered the relative importance of manufacturing in determining overall interprovincial inequality, manufacturing activities are still very unevenly distributed among regions and provinces. The government needs to implement policies that are conducive to the balanced development of non-oil and gas manufacturing industries based on regional comparative advantages and disadvantages, where further development of economic infrastructures and human resources, particularly outside Java-Bali, is essential. Meanwhile, economic tertiarization has raised the importance of service activities in determining overall interprovincial inequality, particularly inequality within Java-Bali. The tertiary sector accounts for more than half of total GDP in Java-Bali, and many service activities, such as IC, banking, business services and private services, are concentrated in Jakarta and neighboring districts. Particularly, with the advancement of IC technologies, the IC sector has been expanding rapidly. Together with banking, business services and private services, further development of the IC sector is likely to increase interprovincial inequality in Java-Bali unless policies that could facilitate geographical dispersion of these service activities are implemented. | |||||
書誌情報 |
Economics & Management Series en : Economics & Management Series 発行日 2020-01 |